diff options
| author | Juan Marín Noguera <juan@mnpi.eu> | 2025-05-16 22:18:44 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Juan Marín Noguera <juan@mnpi.eu> | 2025-05-16 22:18:44 +0200 |
| commit | 4f670b750af5c11e1eac16d9cd8556455f89f46a (patch) | |
| tree | e0f8d7b33df2727d89150f799ee8628821fda80a /2.4.lyx | |
| parent | 16ccda6c459c0fd7ca2081e9d541124c28b0c556 (diff) | |
Changed layout for more manageable volumes
Diffstat (limited to '2.4.lyx')
| -rw-r--r-- | 2.4.lyx | 387 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 387 deletions
diff --git a/2.4.lyx b/2.4.lyx deleted file mode 100644 index 24255ac..0000000 --- a/2.4.lyx +++ /dev/null @@ -1,387 +0,0 @@ -#LyX 2.4 created this file. For more info see https://www.lyx.org/ -\lyxformat 620 -\begin_document -\begin_header -\save_transient_properties true -\origin unavailable -\textclass book -\begin_preamble -\input defs -\end_preamble -\use_default_options true -\maintain_unincluded_children no -\language english -\language_package default -\inputencoding utf8 -\fontencoding auto -\font_roman "default" "default" -\font_sans "default" "default" -\font_typewriter "default" "default" -\font_math "auto" "auto" -\font_default_family default -\use_non_tex_fonts false -\font_sc false -\font_roman_osf false -\font_sans_osf false -\font_typewriter_osf false -\font_sf_scale 100 100 -\font_tt_scale 100 100 -\use_microtype false -\use_dash_ligatures true -\graphics default -\default_output_format default -\output_sync 0 -\bibtex_command default -\index_command default -\float_placement class -\float_alignment class -\paperfontsize default -\spacing single -\use_hyperref false -\papersize default -\use_geometry false -\use_package amsmath 1 -\use_package amssymb 1 -\use_package cancel 1 -\use_package esint 1 -\use_package mathdots 1 -\use_package mathtools 1 -\use_package mhchem 1 -\use_package stackrel 1 -\use_package stmaryrd 1 -\use_package undertilde 1 -\cite_engine basic -\cite_engine_type default -\biblio_style plain -\use_bibtopic false -\use_indices false -\paperorientation portrait -\suppress_date false -\justification true -\use_refstyle 1 -\use_formatted_ref 0 -\use_minted 0 -\use_lineno 0 -\index Index -\shortcut idx -\color #008000 -\end_index -\secnumdepth 3 -\tocdepth 3 -\paragraph_separation indent -\paragraph_indentation default -\is_math_indent 0 -\math_numbering_side default -\quotes_style english -\dynamic_quotes 0 -\papercolumns 1 -\papersides 1 -\paperpagestyle default -\tablestyle default -\tracking_changes false -\output_changes false -\change_bars false -\postpone_fragile_content false -\html_math_output 0 -\html_css_as_file 0 -\html_be_strict false -\docbook_table_output 0 -\docbook_mathml_prefix 1 -\end_header - -\begin_body - -\begin_layout Standard -\begin_inset ERT -status open - -\begin_layout Plain Layout - - -\backslash -exerc1[00] -\end_layout - -\end_inset - -Considering COBOL data configurations as tree structures, - are the data items listed by a COBOL programmer in preorder, - postorder, - or neither of these orders? -\end_layout - -\begin_layout Standard -\begin_inset ERT -status open - -\begin_layout Plain Layout - - -\backslash -answer -\end_layout - -\end_inset - -They are in preorder. -\end_layout - -\begin_layout Standard -\begin_inset ERT -status open - -\begin_layout Plain Layout - - -\backslash -exerc2[10] -\end_layout - -\end_inset - -Comment about the running time of Algorithm A. -\end_layout - -\begin_layout Standard -\begin_inset ERT -status open - -\begin_layout Plain Layout - - -\backslash -answer -\end_layout - -\end_inset - -It takes a constant amount of time for each data item read (assuming that accessing the symbol table takes constant time). - There is also a loop to get out of a nested record, - but each iteration of the loop takes out an item from the stack so we may consider that as part of processing such item. - Therefore the running time is proportional to the number of data items in the input. -\end_layout - -\begin_layout Standard -\begin_inset ERT -status open - -\begin_layout Plain Layout - - -\backslash -exerc8[10] -\end_layout - -\end_inset - -Under what circumstances is -\begin_inset Quotes eld -\end_inset - - -\family typewriter -MOVE CORRESPONDING -\begin_inset Formula $\alpha$ -\end_inset - - TO -\begin_inset Formula $\beta$ -\end_inset - - -\family default - -\begin_inset Quotes erd -\end_inset - - exactly the same as -\begin_inset Quotes eld -\end_inset - - -\family typewriter -MOVE -\begin_inset Formula $\alpha$ -\end_inset - - TO -\begin_inset Formula $\beta$ -\end_inset - - -\family default - -\begin_inset Quotes erd -\end_inset - -, - according to the definition in the text? -\end_layout - -\begin_layout Standard -\begin_inset ERT -status open - -\begin_layout Plain Layout - - -\backslash -answer -\end_layout - -\end_inset - -When -\begin_inset Formula $\alpha$ -\end_inset - - or -\begin_inset Formula $\beta$ -\end_inset - - is an elementary item. -\end_layout - -\begin_layout Standard -\begin_inset ERT -status open - -\begin_layout Plain Layout - - -\backslash -rexerc11[23] -\end_layout - -\end_inset - -What additional links or changes in the strategy of the algorithms of the text could make Algorithm B or Algorithm C faster? -\end_layout - -\begin_layout Standard -\begin_inset ERT -status open - -\begin_layout Plain Layout - - -\backslash -answer -\end_layout - -\end_inset - - -\begin_inset Note Greyedout -status open - -\begin_layout Plain Layout -(I had to look up the solution.) -\end_layout - -\end_inset - - One could make Algorithm C faster by storing sibling nodes in the table in lexicographical order, - so step C3 would have a linear rather than quadratic complexity. -\end_layout - -\begin_layout Standard -\begin_inset ERT -status open - -\begin_layout Plain Layout - - -\backslash -rexerc13[24] -\end_layout - -\end_inset - -Give an algorithm to substitute for Algorithm A when the Data Table is to have the format shown in exercise 12. -\end_layout - -\begin_layout Standard -\begin_inset ERT -status open - -\begin_layout Plain Layout - - -\backslash -answer -\end_layout - -\end_inset - -We remove the instructions that set -\family typewriter -PARENT -\family default -, - -\family typewriter -CHILD -\family default -, - -\family typewriter -SIB -\family default -, - and -\family typewriter -NAME -\family default -, - as those fields do not exist now (in particular, - A6 disappears), - and we implement -\begin_inset Formula $\mathtt{Q}\Leftarrow\mathtt{AVAIL}$ -\end_inset - - in step A2 by sequential allocation. - We set the -\begin_inset Formula $\mathtt{SCOPE}$ -\end_inset - - of an entry when we remove the corresponding item from the stack in step A5. - (Note that we do the same in A5 when -\begin_inset Formula $\mathtt{L1}=\mathtt{L}$ -\end_inset - - as when -\begin_inset Formula $\mathtt{L1}>\mathtt{L}$ -\end_inset - -, - so we could just do those instructions unconditionally, - then after removing the current stack item and before loading the next one we check if -\begin_inset Formula $\mathtt{L1}=\mathtt{L}$ -\end_inset - - and if so we go to A7, - then if -\begin_inset Formula $\mathtt{L1}\geq\mathtt{L}$ -\end_inset - - we repeat, - otherwise we report the error.) -\end_layout - -\begin_layout Standard -For this to work, - we have to get the stack empty by the time the algorithm finishes, - which we can do by setting -\begin_inset Formula $\mathtt{L}\gets0$ -\end_inset - - when the input is exhausted in step A2 and then terminate in step A7 when -\begin_inset Formula $\mathtt{L}=0$ -\end_inset - -. -\end_layout - -\end_body -\end_document |
